View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
SH's SMA envelopes - Contrarion Swing Trading |
vinst Black Belt
Joined: 09 Jan 2007 Posts: 3303
|
Post: #16 Posted: Mon Jun 01, 2009 9:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hi friends,
Look at TataComm. It is near lower end of its mov average envelope. around 450 should be a buy point for this. I am testing envelope strategy in real time with this.
regards,
vin |
|
Back to top |
|
|
| |
Stockhunter White Belt
Joined: 10 Jun 2008 Posts: 193
|
Post: #17 Posted: Tue Jun 09, 2009 7:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
bullishanand wrote: | Hi SH
DLF trading out of its envelope...I tried buying 5 EMA which is 370PE but the issue is only 8 contracts were traded today...should I buy 380PE where more than 50 contracts are traded.. |
Hi bullish - DLF low today was around 345 odd levels.. not sure if you bought 370PE or 380PE or not but I bought 350PE at 12 sold at 17 yesterday. Today that 350PE made a high of 26 ....
Cheers
SH |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ConMan White Belt
Joined: 06 Aug 2008 Posts: 344
|
Post: #18 Posted: Sat Jun 20, 2009 8:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
HI SH...
Kaha ho aaj kal...not to be seen
By the way I couldnt trade in options as the volume were low...was doing day trading in the stock tho... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sandew White Belt
Joined: 02 Feb 2009 Posts: 174
|
Post: #19 Posted: Sun Jun 21, 2009 5:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Going through this strategy - it is nothing but a small twist to Bollinger Band (17,2) instead of usual (20,2). The premise remains the same - go short whenever candle closes outside the Band in uptrend (and reverse in downtrend) and Target 5 / 11 SMA. SL add to price height of the last bar. Cheers
Sandew
ps. 2 in Bollinger corresponds 95% |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You can attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
|