Home
Option Tools
Services Offered
My Services
Contact Us
Charts
Charts (Premium)
Chart Watch
JCharts (EOD)
JCharts(EOD-COMM)
HCharts (EOD)
HCharts (EOD-COMM)
Forum
Stock Lists
Screener (EOD)
Screener (EOD-Comm)
Breadth Charts
Calculators
Education
Links
FAQs
Advertise Here
Charts (Old)
Login Form





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
  iCharts Discussions

 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Swing Trading : The Speculator way
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 16, 17, 18 ... 167, 168, 169  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    iCharts Discussions Forum Index -> Strategies
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Swing Trading : The Speculator way
mariner
White Belt
White Belt


Joined: 06 Nov 2009
Posts: 17

Post: #241   PostPosted: Thu Jan 06, 2011 11:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

spec sir/ shekar sir
plz see the attached nf chart. I have one doubt for current downtrend does 6144 considered as up swing pivot or not ?

tnxs
Mariner



jcharts.png
 Description:
 Filesize:  21.8 KB
 Viewed:  594 Time(s)

jcharts.png


Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
shekharinvest
Yellow Belt
Yellow Belt


Joined: 21 Dec 2007
Posts: 549

Post: #242   PostPosted: Thu Jan 06, 2011 6:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

mariner wrote:
spec sir/ shekar sir
plz see the attached nf chart. I have one doubt for current downtrend does 6144 considered as up swing pivot or not ?

tnxs
Mariner


Mariner,

No. Swing pivot is still at 6209.

When price is quite close to 34 EMA it becomes a bit iffy ? How close is close enough. But I have broadly outlined how to infer. Yet it is all subjective.


Please see the chart attached.

1. Price has failed give a reasonable retracement. It is far off from 34 ema. In fact, it has failed to give a closing above 13 ema.

2. Have a look at the RSI it has not come closer to the OB (70-90) condition. It is yet to move above 50.

Both the above condition suggests that the above retracement is not sufficient and we can not call 6144 as Swing pivot.

The above analysis is based on 34 EMA and 30 Min TF.

Your chart seems to be of different TF and if you are trading that TF you can have your own views.

SHEKHAR



NIFTY JAN A.png
 Description:
 Filesize:  37.73 KB
 Viewed:  524 Time(s)

NIFTY JAN A.png


Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Speculator
Expert
Expert


Joined: 15 Apr 2008
Posts: 149

Post: #243   PostPosted: Thu Jan 06, 2011 7:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I had not visited this thread for a long time, as i treat the "Swing trading" method as a completed project. Honestly there is nothing more to add or teach, other than the techniques discussed. For those interested, application in real-time is the only way to learn. For any doubts, you can contact me on shout-box after the market hours, if you have any doubts.

Shekar,

Happy new year to you as well !


Mariner,

Yes 6144 is a valid downswing pivot on 15-min TF. On the 30-min and 60-min we don't have any downswing pivots established yet.

Jai,

I am really glad that you are able to use the method successfully and make money. Congrats !!


Last edited by Speculator on Thu Jan 06, 2011 7:17 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Speculator
Expert
Expert


Joined: 15 Apr 2008
Posts: 149

Post: #244   PostPosted: Thu Jan 06, 2011 7:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Shekar,

I just read your reply to mariner. The RSI not getting overbought is an excellent point you make. When the RSI(5) gets overbought and a rejection, happens, it a solid indication of a pivot without any ambiguity. Although, i must say it is strictly not necessary according to the swing trading method. A touch of EMA and rejection is sufficient. However, when there is ambiguity, one can look at the RSI for additional confirmation.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
shekharinvest
Yellow Belt
Yellow Belt


Joined: 21 Dec 2007
Posts: 549

Post: #245   PostPosted: Thu Jan 06, 2011 7:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi Speculator,

Thanks for the warm wishes.

May this New year bring Happiness and Joy to you and your family !

Nice to see you on the forum.


SHEKHAR
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mariner
White Belt
White Belt


Joined: 06 Nov 2009
Posts: 17

Post: #246   PostPosted: Thu Jan 06, 2011 8:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanxs Spec and Shekar sir for explaning.
Regards
Mariner
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Speculator
Expert
Expert


Joined: 15 Apr 2008
Posts: 149

Post: #247   PostPosted: Tue Jan 18, 2011 8:57 am    Post subject: Trading rejections Reply with quote

Trading rejections

It's been more than an year since the "Swing trading the Speculator way" was posted. I still get basic questions in the shout-box such as "Is this a valid rejection ?". So i thought i will revisit this subject again.


Trading rejections is a way of trading with the trend. Rejections are based on the concept of mean reversion. Once a trend change occurs, the prices cross the 34 ema. Once this move gets overextended or overbought, a mean reversion to the neutral level occurs. 34 ema and 55 ema are generally the neutral levels on 15-min and 30-min timeframes. One can choose either 34 or 55 ema and both are equally valid. I personally use the 34 ema on both 15-min and 30-min timeframes for Nifty. Depending on the volatility of the stock and the timeframe, this neutral level can change. For instance on the 60-min timeframe, 13 ema happens to be the neutral level. I only trade 15-min and 30-min of Nifty generally. So let's focus on that.

Traders get anxious that they will miss a move, once a trend change occurs. But i would go to the extent of saying that a mean reversion to 34 ema "always" happens, except in some rare scenarios where a parabolic blowoff move occurs. Anyway trading parabolic blowoffs is a dangerous sport and rare occurrence, which does not merit out attention. So in a normal market environment, 34 ema acts a magnet pulling prices towards it after a trend gets overbought. Trading rejections is basically participating in the trend after a correction is over. The rules of rejection are very simple and unambigous

For a Bullish rejection, the stock/index is trading above the 34 ema, comes down either close to the 34 ema or touches the 34 ema or undershoots the 34 ema and reverses. For the rejection candle (trade entry candle) , the following rules must be satisfied:

1) Candle close should be above 34 ema
2) Candle close should be above the high of the prior candle.
3) 8 EMA should be rising (that is the 8 ema of the current candle should be higher than the 8 ema of the previous candle)

I added the rule #3 as a refinement (or filter) to avoid taking weak rejections. If 1) and 2) are satisifed and 3) is not satisfied, then it means the correction is still in progress.


For a Bearish rejection, the stock/index is trading below the 34 ema, comes up either close to the 34 ema or touches the 34 ema or overshoots the 34 ema and reverses. For the rejection candle (trade entry candle) , the following rules must be satisfied:

1) Candle close should be below 34 ema
2) Candle close should be below the low of the prior candle.
3) 8 EMA should be falling. (that is the 8 ema of the current candle should be lower than the 8 ema of the previous candle)

Here are some visual examples of rejections on both 15-min and 30-min charts which have occurred over the last few weeks. SL level for rejection is shown with a pink line and the valid rejection candles are shown in pink circles. Invalid rejections are shown in black circles.


15-min - nf1_15.gif, nf2_15.gif, nf3_15.gif



#1 - Invalid rejection. Rule 2) not satisfied.
#2,#3,#4 - Valid rejection. All rules satisfied.
#5 - Invalid rejection. Rule 2) not satisfied.
#6, #7 - Valid rejections
#8- Invalid rejection. Rule 2) not satisfied.
#9 - Valid rejection
#10 - Invalid rejection. Rule 2) not satisfied.
#11 - Valid rejection
#12,14,15,17,18 - valid rejections
#13 - Invalid rejection. Rule 2) not satisfied.
#16 - Invalid rejection. Rule 3) not satisfied.

If one had traded the valid rejections, most rejections made money except #6 and #17.

#6 occurred at the final stage of the trend, just before the trend reversal. But one has to take all the signals bcoz we never know for sure when the trend reverses.

#17 was a case of failed rejection.

So out of 12 valid rejections, there were only 2 failures. That's an 83% odds of success !


30-min - nf1_30.gif, nf2_30.gif, nf3_30.gif


#1 - Invalid rejection. Rule 3) not satisfied.
#2,#3, #4, #5 - Valid rejection. All rules satisfied.
#6 - Invalid rejection. Rule 2) not satisfied.
#7, #8 - valid rejection.


#8 although a valid rejection is hard to trade as the SL required is very huge. I would put that in the category of untraedable.

#7 is a case of rejection failure and would have lost money.

So out of 5 valid rejections, there was one failure - That's 80% odds of success !

- Speculator Very Happy



nf3_30.GIF
 Description:
 Filesize:  33.88 KB
 Viewed:  901 Time(s)

nf3_30.GIF



nf2_30.GIF
 Description:
 Filesize:  36.49 KB
 Viewed:  726 Time(s)

nf2_30.GIF



nf1_30.GIF
 Description:
 Filesize:  38.34 KB
 Viewed:  706 Time(s)

nf1_30.GIF



nf3_15.GIF
 Description:
 Filesize:  50.51 KB
 Viewed:  720 Time(s)

nf3_15.GIF



nf2_15.gif
 Description:
 Filesize:  40.75 KB
 Viewed:  690 Time(s)

nf2_15.gif



nf1_15.GIF
 Description:
 Filesize:  37.65 KB
 Viewed:  735 Time(s)

nf1_15.GIF




Last edited by Speculator on Mon Jun 20, 2011 11:54 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
vishytns
White Belt
White Belt


Joined: 26 Nov 2009
Posts: 206

Post: #248   PostPosted: Tue Jan 18, 2011 10:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Spec Sir,
Thanks alot for your article. It is really great. I will come back to you with some queries later.
regards
Vishy
Smile
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
vinst
Black Belt
Black Belt


Joined: 09 Jan 2007
Posts: 3303

Post: #249   PostPosted: Tue Jan 18, 2011 11:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi Speculator,

Thanks really for a great summary with numerous useful examples.

regards
vin
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
casper
Green Belt
Green Belt


Joined: 02 Oct 2010
Posts: 1315

Post: #250   PostPosted: Tue Jan 18, 2011 11:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

speculator sir

is it a valid rejection?



abb 30 min.png
 Description:
 Filesize:  19.59 KB
 Viewed:  426 Time(s)

abb 30 min.png


Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
smartcancerian
Yellow Belt
Yellow Belt


Joined: 07 Apr 2010
Posts: 542

Post: #251   PostPosted: Wed Jan 19, 2011 3:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sir , pl help to mark entry/exits & rejections on nickel 15 mint chart..emas on chart are 8 & 34..


nickel.png
 Description:
 Filesize:  21.24 KB
 Viewed:  432 Time(s)

nickel.png



nickel.png
 Description:
 Filesize:  21.24 KB
 Viewed:  352 Time(s)

nickel.png


Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
smartcancerian
Yellow Belt
Yellow Belt


Joined: 07 Apr 2010
Posts: 542

Post: #252   PostPosted: Wed Jan 19, 2011 3:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

sorry chart was attached twice
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
KillBull
White Belt
White Belt


Joined: 03 Sep 2010
Posts: 2

Post: #253   PostPosted: Wed Jan 19, 2011 9:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thnaks Spec... whatever little i know of trading i know from your methods, posts and sb comments. Thanks much!!! Smile
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ashis
White Belt
White Belt


Joined: 28 Mar 2010
Posts: 75

Post: #254   PostPosted: Wed Jan 19, 2011 11:49 pm    Post subject: Re: Trading rejections Reply with quote

Dear sir,
Thanks for this good post. Which is good for study.
(1) I would like to know one thing that how can you decide stop loss? Is it at the time when in up trend candle gives whole body with shadow bellow 8-EMA? So can we consider low of this candle as stop loss? Or any thing else to decide stop loss? Please guide. I observe this thing in you NF-1 (15)

(2) Other question is that you've written in rule 2 that close of candle must be above the prior high.
You means that once O.B. happened then allow RSI come to near 50- or bellow that then once again when market pulls back at that time candle's close must be higher then previous high. Is right which I understand?
If market make new high in 2nd attempt but close of it is bellow then previous high then what?

Awaiting for you reply.
Thanks
Ashis



Speculator wrote:
Trading rejections

It's been more than an year since the "Swing trading the Speculator way" was posted. I still get basic questions in the shout-box such as "Is this a valid rejection ?". So i thought i will revisit this subject again.


Trading rejections is a way of trading with the trend. Rejections are based on the concept of mean reversion. Once a trend change occurs, the prices cross the 34 ema. Once this move gets overextended or overbought, a mean reversion to the neutral level occurs. 34 ema and 55 ema are generally the neutral levels on 15-min and 30-min timeframes. One can choose either 34 or 55 ema and both are equally valid. I personally use the 34 ema on both 15-min and 30-min timeframes for Nifty. Depending on the volatility of the stock and the timeframe, this neutral level can change. For instance on the 60-min timeframe, 13 ema happens to be the neutral level. I only trade 15-min and 30-min of Nifty generally. So let's focus on that.

Traders get anxious that they will miss a move, once a trend change occurs. But i would go to the extent of saying that a mean reversion to 34 ema "always" happens, except in some rare scenarios where a parabolic blowoff move occurs. Anyway trading parabolic blowoffs is a dangerous sport and rare occurrence, which does not merit out attention. So in a normal market environment, 34 ema acts a magnet pulling prices towards it after a trend gets overbought. Trading rejections is basically participating in the trend after a correction is over. The rules of rejection are very simple and unambigous

For a Bullish rejection, the stock/index is trading above the 34 ema, comes down either close to the 34 ema or touches the 34 ema or undershoots the 34 ema and reverses. For the rejection candle (trade entry candle) , the following rules must be satisfied:

1) Candle close should be above 34 ema
2) Candle close should be above the high of the prior candle.
3) Candle close should be above the 8 EMA

I added the rule #3 as a refinement (or filter) to avoid taking weak rejections. If 1) and 2) are satisifed and 3) is not satisfied, then it means the correction is still in progress.


For a Bearish rejection, the stock/index is trading below the 34 ema, comes up either close to the 34 ema or touches the 34 ema or overshoots the 34 ema and reverses. For the rejection candle (trade entry candle) , the following rules must be satisfied:

1) Candle close should be below 34 ema
2) Candle close should be below the low of the prior candle.
3) Candle close should be below the 8 EMA

Here are some visual examples of rejections on both 15-min and 30-min charts which have occurred over the last few weeks. SL level for rejection is shown with a pink line and the valid rejection candles are shown in pink circles. Invalid rejections are shown in black circles.


15-min - nf1_15.gif, nf2_15.gif, nf3_15.gif



#1 - Invalid rejection. Rule 2) not satisfied.
#2,#3,#4 - Valid rejection. All rules satisfied.
#5 - Invalid rejection. Rule 2) not satisfied.
#6, #7 - Valid rejections
#8- Invalid rejection. Rule 2) not satisfied.
#9 - Valid rejection
#10 - Invalid rejection. Rule 2) not satisfied.
#11 - Valid rejection
#12,14,15,17,18 - valid rejections
#13 - Invalid rejection. Rule 2) not satisfied.
#16 - Invalid rejection. Rule 3) not satisfied.

If one had traded the valid rejections, most rejections made money except #6 and #17.

#6 occurred at the final stage of the trend, just before the trend reversal. But one has to take all the signals bcoz we never know for sure when the trend reverses.

#17 was a case of failed rejection.

So out of 12 valid rejections, there were only 2 failures. That's an 83% odds of success !


30-min - nf1_30.gif, nf2_30.gif, nf3_30.gif


#1 - Invalid rejection. Rule 3) not satisfied.
#2,#3, #4, #5 - Valid rejection. All rules satisfied.
#6 - Invalid rejection. Rule 2) not satisfied.
#7, #8 - valid rejection.


#8 although a valid rejection is hard to trade as the SL required is very huge. I would put that in the category of untraedable.

#7 is a case of rejection failure and would have lost money.

So out of 5 valid rejections, there was one failure - That's 80% odds of success !

- Speculator Very Happy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
chetan83
Brown Belt
Brown Belt


Joined: 19 Feb 2010
Posts: 2036

Post: #255   PostPosted: Thu Jan 20, 2011 1:10 am    Post subject: Re: Trading rejections Reply with quote

Speculator wrote:
Trading rejections

It's been more than an year since the "Swing trading the Speculator way" was posted. I still get basic questions in the shout-box such as "Is this a valid rejection ?". So i thought i will revisit this subject again.


Trading rejections is a way of trading with the trend. Rejections are based on the concept of mean reversion. Once a trend change occurs, the prices cross the 34 ema. Once this move gets overextended or overbought, a mean reversion to the neutral level occurs. 34 ema and 55 ema are generally the neutral levels on 15-min and 30-min timeframes. One can choose either 34 or 55 ema and both are equally valid. I personally use the 34 ema on both 15-min and 30-min timeframes for Nifty. Depending on the volatility of the stock and the timeframe, this neutral level can change. For instance on the 60-min timeframe, 13 ema happens to be the neutral level. I only trade 15-min and 30-min of Nifty generally. So let's focus on that.

Traders get anxious that they will miss a move, once a trend change occurs. But i would go to the extent of saying that a mean reversion to 34 ema "always" happens, except in some rare scenarios where a parabolic blowoff move occurs. Anyway trading parabolic blowoffs is a dangerous sport and rare occurrence, which does not merit out attention. So in a normal market environment, 34 ema acts a magnet pulling prices towards it after a trend gets overbought. Trading rejections is basically participating in the trend after a correction is over. The rules of rejection are very simple and unambigous

For a Bullish rejection, the stock/index is trading above the 34 ema, comes down either close to the 34 ema or touches the 34 ema or undershoots the 34 ema and reverses. For the rejection candle (trade entry candle) , the following rules must be satisfied:

1) Candle close should be above 34 ema
2) Candle close should be above the high of the prior candle.
3) Candle close should be above the 8 EMA

I added the rule #3 as a refinement (or filter) to avoid taking weak rejections. If 1) and 2) are satisifed and 3) is not satisfied, then it means the correction is still in progress.


For a Bearish rejection, the stock/index is trading below the 34 ema, comes up either close to the 34 ema or touches the 34 ema or overshoots the 34 ema and reverses. For the rejection candle (trade entry candle) , the following rules must be satisfied:

1) Candle close should be below 34 ema
2) Candle close should be below the low of the prior candle.
3) Candle close should be below the 8 EMA

Here are some visual examples of rejections on both 15-min and 30-min charts which have occurred over the last few weeks. SL level for rejection is shown with a pink line and the valid rejection candles are shown in pink circles. Invalid rejections are shown in black circles.


15-min - nf1_15.gif, nf2_15.gif, nf3_15.gif



#1 - Invalid rejection. Rule 2) not satisfied.
#2,#3,#4 - Valid rejection. All rules satisfied.
#5 - Invalid rejection. Rule 2) not satisfied.
#6, #7 - Valid rejections
#8- Invalid rejection. Rule 2) not satisfied.
#9 - Valid rejection
#10 - Invalid rejection. Rule 2) not satisfied.
#11 - Valid rejection
#12,14,15,17,18 - valid rejections
#13 - Invalid rejection. Rule 2) not satisfied.
#16 - Invalid rejection. Rule 3) not satisfied.

If one had traded the valid rejections, most rejections made money except #6 and #17.

#6 occurred at the final stage of the trend, just before the trend reversal. But one has to take all the signals bcoz we never know for sure when the trend reverses.

#17 was a case of failed rejection.

So out of 12 valid rejections, there were only 2 failures. That's an 83% odds of success !


30-min - nf1_30.gif, nf2_30.gif, nf3_30.gif


#1 - Invalid rejection. Rule 3) not satisfied.
#2,#3, #4, #5 - Valid rejection. All rules satisfied.
#6 - Invalid rejection. Rule 2) not satisfied.
#7, #8 - valid rejection.


#8 although a valid rejection is hard to trade as the SL required is very huge. I would put that in the category of untraedable.

#7 is a case of rejection failure and would have lost money.

So out of 5 valid rejections, there was one failure - That's 80% odds of success !

- Speculator Very Happy


Hi Spec,

I checked ur points on rejection even on 5 min TF, even they suffice in those charts. Points here to be asked is, do we need to switch to 13 EMA for shorter time frames?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    iCharts Discussions Forum Index -> Strategies All times are GMT + 5.5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 16, 17, 18 ... 167, 168, 169  Next
Page 17 of 169

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You can attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group

@MEMBER OF PROJECT HONEY POT
Spam Harvester Protection Network
provided by Unspam